fat64
01-12-2006, 05:25 PM
Would that be a certain Battlestar 557 in the forum heading?
Forum pic?fat64 01-12-2006, 05:25 PM Would that be a certain Battlestar 557 in the forum heading? chilly 01-12-2006, 05:44 PM That's actually the Battlestar 514 fat64 01-12-2006, 06:04 PM Wow! Did it see any track time for a comparison with the 557? chilly 01-12-2006, 06:06 PM I want to say the best the 514 ran on motor was 10.70s, 10.40s on a small shot of juice.... fat64 01-12-2006, 06:25 PM I seem to remember Greg going 9.98 on motor only a couple of years back.Nearly a second better. Maybe a bit more put in than just the extra 43 cubes? chilly 01-12-2006, 07:35 PM Ported heads, more cam, a lot more compression...plus I believe the 9 was run in mineshaft air, I'm not sure if he ever ran the 514 on motor in really good air. But for sure, the 557 combo seemed to really pick up quite a bit for the amount of hardware changed. | |