Got my 466 apart for a little freshen up, intake gaskets,valve seals, new springs, and have been considering trying a TORKER 2 in place of my current Performer RPM (non-air gap).
The car is 73 Mach1 with C6 trans/2500 Coan converter & 3:89 gears w/spool.
Motor pretty mild 9:1 466, D3VE heads with some exhaust porting,stock valve sizes,Crane hyd cam 220/230-.520/.530 Holley 850 DP, Hooker 1-7/8 headers
It runs [email protected] with above combination.
Used to be a fairly active track car, but not as much any more.
Very little street driving with the car, just once in a while for fun so I dont really care about manners or driveablility but with the Performer RPM the throttle response & low/mid torque is great.....but I cant help but wonder if the Torker 2 will pick it up on the top.
With the 2500 converter, perhaps any sacrifice in low end will not be noticed?
It seems the Performer RPM has only moderate plenum volume and rather small but smooth/shapely runners.
Let me know what you guys think before I just blow a couple hundred bucks.
thanks
Rick
The car is 73 Mach1 with C6 trans/2500 Coan converter & 3:89 gears w/spool.
Motor pretty mild 9:1 466, D3VE heads with some exhaust porting,stock valve sizes,Crane hyd cam 220/230-.520/.530 Holley 850 DP, Hooker 1-7/8 headers
It runs [email protected] with above combination.
Used to be a fairly active track car, but not as much any more.
Very little street driving with the car, just once in a while for fun so I dont really care about manners or driveablility but with the Performer RPM the throttle response & low/mid torque is great.....but I cant help but wonder if the Torker 2 will pick it up on the top.
With the 2500 converter, perhaps any sacrifice in low end will not be noticed?
It seems the Performer RPM has only moderate plenum volume and rather small but smooth/shapely runners.
Let me know what you guys think before I just blow a couple hundred bucks.
thanks
Rick