Let's not start A pissing-match on turbo vs super charger, please. Use what you like, and point-out potential benefits of specific types or combinations; but let's not spread generalities of worst-case, as we have enough of that in the web now. Any system can be configured to provide solid solutions, and turbo or supercharger is mostly a preference rather than a requirement. Do your homework, make a plan, and do your thing.
Agreed, but (especially turbo) it usually doesn't stop at the original target power. The urge and capability to just turn that knob a little more gets to most folks. As Hastings and others showed the appropriate wider ring gaps to have low impact on sealing and leak-down, I'd prep the engine for up-to the max it
could see with that combo, before dropping it in. The other up-side is that the option to increase the power without increasing rpm is easily available, or decrease it if proper-grade fuel isn't available. Human nature insurance.

OK, so the perspective of a supercharger salesman is apparent.

Let me be clear—I love all forms of power adders, including superchargers. I'm here to help however I can, not sell stuff. Some of those statements are way-out there, and either don't apply or are also applicable to SCs. Let's be fair and considerate, and address the OP's questions. My goal is to see user satisfaction, including owner goals, costs, skills, etc. The OP said turbo, so I'll find the combination that does what he wants, likely less costly, more reliable, and easier than other ways. It's his goals that count, not anyone else's.